Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Government

U.S. Proposes Easier Path to Debt Relief for Defrauded Students

By Kelly Field June 13, 2016
Washington

Student-loan borrowers who are defrauded by their colleges could soon find it easier to get their debt forgiven and to sue their colleges for wrongdoing, under a proposed rule that the Education Department is set to issue on Thursday.

The draft rule, which was prompted by the abrupt collapse of Corinthian Colleges, in 2014, and closure a year later, would allow groups of students — not just individuals — to have their federal loans discharged in cases of fraud, and would ban the use of mandatory-arbitration clauses that can force borrowers to settle claims against their colleges out of court.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Student-loan borrowers who are defrauded by their colleges could soon find it easier to get their debt forgiven and to sue their colleges for wrongdoing, under a proposed rule that the Education Department is set to issue on Thursday.

The draft rule, which was prompted by the abrupt collapse of Corinthian Colleges, in 2014, and closure a year later, would allow groups of students — not just individuals — to have their federal loans discharged in cases of fraud, and would ban the use of mandatory-arbitration clauses that can force borrowers to settle claims against their colleges out of court.

The rule would also require colleges that engage in misconduct or show signs of financial distress to post letters of credit to the Department of Education, and to disclose their problems to current and prospective students. For-profit colleges with low loan-repayment rates would have to issue warnings to students, too.

The Obama administration’s goals are twofold: to provide relief to students who attend shoddy colleges, and to protect the taxpayers who help finance those institutions through the federal student-aid program. After Corinthian’s collapse, thousands of students filed “borrower defense to repayment” claims seeking to have their federal loans forgiven by the federal government. But because Corinthian went bankrupt, the government will recover none of that money.

“We won’t sit idly by while dodgy schools leave students with piles of debt and taxpayers holding the bag,” the secretary of education, John B. King Jr., told reporters on Monday in a conference call.

In the two years since Corinthian’s collapse, more than 23,000 borrowers who attended Corinthian and other for-profit colleges have filed “borrower defense” claims with the department. As of late March, 2,048 of those borrowers had been granted forgiveness totaling $42.3 million.

Student and consumer groups welcomed the proposal on Monday, saying a group-claims process would provide relief to many more students than the current, individualized approach. And they praised the ban on forced-arbitration clauses, saying students should not be forced to sign away their rights to sue their institution.

“Today’s proposed rule is about justice: compensating the victims of past misdeeds, and making it more difficult for disreputable colleges to escape responsibility,” said Robert M. Shireman and Tariq Habash of the Century Foundation, which recently released a report detailing how for-profit colleges use enrollment clauses, including mandatory-arbitration requirements, to limit students’ rights.

‘Complex and Burdensome’

For-profit colleges, which are the target of the proposed rule, were, not surprisingly, less than thrilled about it. Steve Gunderson, president and chief executive of the Career Education Colleges and Universities, formerly the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities, called the rule “complex and burdensome,” part of an “ideological” agenda to crush the sector.

The regulation, he warned, “will cause millions of students to lose access to higher education and leave American taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars.”

We won’t sit idly by while dodgy schools leave students with piles of debt and taxpayers holding the bag.

The federal rule that allows borrowers to seek loan discharges in cases of fraud isn’t new; it’s been on the books since 1995. But it was rarely used before the Corinthian collapse, and the department has had no process for evaluating group claims.

ADVERTISEMENT

A chief complaint about the rule has been that it treats borrowers differently, depending on where they live. Because the regulation requires borrowers to prove a cause of action under state law, students in states with strong consumer-protection laws or aggressive attorneys general have been more likely to obtain relief than those in states with weak laws or lax regulators.

Monday’s proposed rule would create a federal standard for reviewing claims, providing a clearer and more consistent path to debt relief.

The proposal ‘will cause millions of students to lose access to higher education and leave American taxpayers on the hook for billions of dollars.’

It would also create several new “triggers” that would require colleges to post letters of credit worth at least 10 percent of the amount of federal student aid they received in the prior year. The triggers include a major state or federal lawsuit, a “substantial number” of borrower-defense claims, a default on a college’s debt, and an action by an accreditor that could lead to a loss of accreditation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Publication of the draft rule comes three months after a panel of negotiators convened by the Education Department disbanded, unable to reach consensus on a rule. One of the sticking points in their negotiations was mandatory arbitration: Student and consumer groups were pushing for a comprehensive ban, but the department’s own negotiators were leaning toward allowing it in some cases.

Once the proposed rule is published, there will be a 45-day public-comment period. The administration aims to publish a final rule by November 1, so that it can take effect in July 2017.

Kelly Field is a senior reporter covering federal higher-education policy. Contact her at kelly.field@chronicle.com. Or follow her on Twitter @kfieldCHE.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Kelly Field
Kelly Field joined The Chronicle of Higher Education in 2004 and covered federal higher-education policy. She continues to write for The Chronicle on a freelance basis.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Illustration showing a letter from the South Carolina Secretary of State over a photo of the Bob Jones University campus.
Missing Files
Apparent Paperwork Error Threatens Bob Jones U.'s Legal Standing in South Carolina
Pro-Palestinian student protesters demonstrate outside Barnard College in New York on February 27, 2025, the morning after pro-Palestinian student protesters stormed a Barnard College building to protest the expulsion last month of two students who interrupted a university class on Israel. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY / AFP) (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
A College Vows to Stop Engaging With Some Student Activists to Settle a Lawsuit Brought by Jewish Students
LeeNIHGhosting-0709
Stuck in limbo
The Scientists Who Got Ghosted by the NIH
Protesters attend a demonstration in support of Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, March 10, 2025, in New York.
First-Amendment Rights
Noncitizen Professors Testify About Chilling Effect of Others’ Detentions

From The Review

Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky
Photo-based illustration depicting a close-up image of a mouth of a young woman with the letter A over the lips and grades in the background
The Review | Opinion
When Students Want You to Change Their Grades
By James K. Beggan

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin