> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • Student Success Resource Center
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
The Review
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

We Make Tenure Decisions Unfairly. Here’s a Better Way.

By  Leah Wasburn-Moses
March 27, 2018

It was a Friday night, and I had just sat through one too many promotion-and-tenure meetings. After 12 years on the tenure track, having played the game well enough to be promoted to full, I was simply fed up with the system. I typed a single statement in my “Updates” on Facebook: “Friends on the Tenure Track: I feel as though our futures hinge on: (1) the amount of research we produce that nobody will ever read, (2) the extent to which our students like us, and (3) the number of committees we chair that will never do anything.” I asked my husband, “Before I click ‘post,’ is this too controversial?” He shrugged, and I hit the enter key, and waited.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

It was a Friday night, and I had just sat through one too many promotion-and-tenure meetings. After 12 years on the tenure track, having played the game well enough to be promoted to full, I was simply fed up with the system. I typed a single statement in my “Updates” on Facebook: “Friends on the Tenure Track: I feel as though our futures hinge on: (1) the amount of research we produce that nobody will ever read, (2) the extent to which our students like us, and (3) the number of committees we chair that will never do anything.” I asked my husband, “Before I click ‘post,’ is this too controversial?” He shrugged, and I hit the enter key, and waited.

Although I was not surprised that the comment generated some controversy (particularly for me, whose posts might not always involve cats but are generally benign), I was surprised to see comments of the if-she-feels-that-way-she-should-retire-or-get-another-job sort. I was intrigued with my colleagues’ responses, primarily because I was fairly certain that all of my assertions could be backed by evidence. I decided to take a closer look at what is known about effectiveness and outcomes in the areas of teaching, research, and service.

Teaching: Although many professors love teaching, not many love teaching evaluations or think they are a good measure of quality. These perceptions are backed by research. A meta-analysis on end-of-course evaluations found no significant correlation between those evaluations and student learning. In fact, the meta-analysis overturned decades of previous studies upholding the use of this type of evaluation. Considering the strong evidence from other studies that gender, race, and other elements unrelated to teaching effectiveness have a significant impact on these ratings, there can be no justification for retaining their use in any decisions affecting a professor’s career.

Research: Current reward systems are based on both quality and quantity of research. Unfortunately, at least one study found that the average academic article is read by about 10 people, and half of these articles are never read at all. Ninety percent are never cited. Even the Journal Impact Factor, a measure for ranking technical journals by how often they are cited, has been shown to be misleading and misunderstood. Further, women and minority faculty members often lack the mentoring that would help them publish in prestigious journals and obtain competitive grants, leaving them at a disadvantage. It is difficult to understand and justify a system that continues to value the publication of academic journal articles and books as the gold standard in research, over which career-ending decisions are made.

Service: Anyone who has served on multiple university committees may find it challenging to defend the wider value of internal university service. There is not much evidence to be found regarding the impact of any type of service, including national, elected leadership positions — the standard by which promotion-and-tenure decisions are often made. Research shows that among associate professors, minority and female faculty members are consistently asked to perform more service, perceived as the least important of the three areas considered for tenure, than their white and/or male peers, thus disadvantaging them further.

ADVERTISEMENT

Academic careers, then, are often determined by so-called evidence that is flimsy at best, from teaching evaluations that are unrelated to student learning, to professional writing that is rarely if ever read, to service that is difficult if not impossible to evaluate. Further, the bias introduced by factors such as race and gender in each of these areas is unacceptable. I suggest three alternative approaches to evaluating a candidate for tenure.

1. Invest in ways to measure teaching effectiveness through student learning. We live in an era of testing and accountability, so why not make it work for us? Our disciplines have experts in measurement, so let’s use them. Another pathway is to invest in the development of instruments such as the Tripod assessment, a system of student feedback used in grade-school education that has been tied to educator effectiveness and is used across the country. We need to ask the right questions in the right way.

2. Reconsider measurements of research effectiveness. Instead of a single standard across all disciplines, consider what scholarship actually makes a difference in each field. For example, in my field of teacher education, “engaged scholarship” should be included in any professor’s evaluation. Such work is conducted in partnership with the community, integrates teaching, research, and service, and can be measured by impact on the community served. Other ways to measure research effectiveness could include citations, contributions to larger projects, or impact on various lay and professional communities. Offering multiple options opens the door to cross-disciplinary collaboration and innovation.

3. Judge impact. Service can be reimagined as the outcome from combining research with teaching, or the overall impact of a professor’s work. Service should focus on measurable accomplishments, such as distributing teaching materials, developing service projects, spearheading community growth and development, or bringing expertise to outsiders. These types of service are often minimized by promotion-and-tenure committees automatically, without considering their scope or overall impact.

Let’s not waste any more time and effort perpetuating a system that appears flawed in nearly every way. Let’s not let any more committed, effective, engaged professors go because their contributions didn’t fit into our narrow system of what counts as scholarship or national reputation. It’s past time to overturn a system created nearly 80 years ago and determine what true impact means in today’s world of higher education. By remaining silent, those of us who are full professors and those of us in leadership positions are perpetuating this system of bias and doing harm to those who are affected by it.

ADVERTISEMENT

Leah Wasburn-Moses is a professor in the College of Education, Health and Society at Miami University.  

A version of this article appeared in the April 27, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Leadership & GovernanceOpinion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

  • What Delayed Course Evaluations Might — and Might Not — Reveal
  • The Number That’s Devouring Science
  • Many Departments Continue to Struggle Over Service
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin