> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
The Review
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

When Lincoln’s Morality Met Politics

February 7, 2016

To the Editor:

I thank John Herron for his helpful and informative summary of my book Lincoln’s Ethics (“Lincoln the Political Operator,” December 11). However, I disagree with two of Herron’s criticisms.

1. Herron writes, “When the Whigs dissolved, he joined cause with the Republicans but also a loose confederation of pro-Union Democrats. He did so because they shared not his ethics but his understanding of politics.” But the Republican Party was an antislavery party, and Lincoln’s bitter opposition to slavery was a central reason why he joined the party. He re-entered politics in the mid-1850s because he was “roused as never before” by the Kansas-Nebraska Act and his fear that it would lead to the expansion and perpetuation of slavery. Lincoln opposed slavery because he thought that it was morally wrong and a “monstrous injustice.”

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

To the Editor:

I thank John Herron for his helpful and informative summary of my book Lincoln’s Ethics (“Lincoln the Political Operator,” December 11). However, I disagree with two of Herron’s criticisms.

1. Herron writes, “When the Whigs dissolved, he joined cause with the Republicans but also a loose confederation of pro-Union Democrats. He did so because they shared not his ethics but his understanding of politics.” But the Republican Party was an antislavery party, and Lincoln’s bitter opposition to slavery was a central reason why he joined the party. He re-entered politics in the mid-1850s because he was “roused as never before” by the Kansas-Nebraska Act and his fear that it would lead to the expansion and perpetuation of slavery. Lincoln opposed slavery because he thought that it was morally wrong and a “monstrous injustice.”

2. I am very puzzled by Herron’s assertion that “Carson’s ethical Lincoln occupies a special position outside the messy world of traditional politics. But reinterpreting ordinary political operations as idealism not only skews our understanding of history but also distorts our view of workable party politics.” Nothing I say in the book implies that Lincoln was outside “the messy world of traditional politics.” Indeed, I stress his willingness to make morally fraught political compromises, his use of deception and bribery to help pass the 13th Amendment, his willingness to pander to the voters’ racial prejudices, and his great reluctance to push for policies that lacked popular political support.

Lincoln was a master politician and a very ambitious one. But his political activities and political ambitions served a higher moral purpose. As he said of himself, he sought to acquire the esteem of others by rendering himself worthy of their esteem, and he wanted to be remembered for doing things that redounded to the interest of humanity. Lincoln’s own utilitarian moral ideals sanctioned entering into the messy world of politics and sometimes sanctioned choosing the lesser of two evils and using dubious means in order to best promote the general welfare. On this point, Herron misinterprets utilitarianism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thomas L. Carson
Professor of Philosophy
Loyola University Chicago

A version of this article appeared in the February 12, 2016, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Opinion
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin