Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Admissions

Why Colleges May Be Chasing the Wrong Numbers to Enroll More Low-Income Students

By Chris Quintana January 25, 2019
Caroline Hoxby (pictured), a Stanford U. economist, and Sarah Turner, an economist at the U. of Virginia, wrote a new paper arguing that colleges are oversimplifying the quest to raise the enrollment of low-income students.
Caroline Hoxby (pictured), a Stanford U. economist, and Sarah Turner, an economist at the U. of Virginia, wrote a new paper arguing that colleges are oversimplifying the quest to raise the enrollment of low-income students.Rob Kim, Getty Images

A new report by a pair of researchers known for their work on low-income students suggests colleges are thinking about serving that group in the wrong way.

The findings — from Caroline M. Hoxby, a professor of economics at Stanford University, and Sarah Turner, a professor of economics at the University of Virginia — come at a time when colleges, especially elite ones, have faced increasing public pressure to admit more low-income students.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Caroline Hoxby (pictured), a Stanford U. economist, and Sarah Turner, an economist at the U. of Virginia, wrote a new paper arguing that colleges are oversimplifying the quest to raise the enrollment of low-income students.
Caroline Hoxby (pictured), a Stanford U. economist, and Sarah Turner, an economist at the U. of Virginia, wrote a new paper arguing that colleges are oversimplifying the quest to raise the enrollment of low-income students.Rob Kim, Getty Images

A new report by a pair of researchers known for their work on low-income students suggests colleges are thinking about serving that group in the wrong way.

The findings — from Caroline M. Hoxby, a professor of economics at Stanford University, and Sarah Turner, a professor of economics at the University of Virginia — come at a time when colleges, especially elite ones, have faced increasing public pressure to admit more low-income students.

Hoxby and Turner’s own research on undermatching — the notion that high-achieving but needy students often enroll at colleges below their intellectual caliber — suggested that some low-income students weren’t applying to selective institutions, and that colleges could make up ground simply by getting them to apply. Colleges took note.

But the duo also urged institutions to use thoughtful and data-driven approaches to better serve low-income students. What happened instead, Hoxby and Turner told The Chronicle on Friday, is that colleges rushed to increase their overall percentage of low-income students, and seemed to miss the bit about careful planning.

“People at some level didn’t pay attention to what we said in those articles,” Hoxby said. “That message got completely lost.”

The thrust of their most recent project, a National Bureau of Economic Research working paper titled “Measuring Opportunity in U.S. Higher Education,” elaborates on that thought.

Specifically, the researchers challenge the idea that colleges should be judged successful based primarily on the percentage of their students whose families are in the bottom quintile of national earners or who are eligible for Pell Grants, the main federal student-aid program based on need.

Hoxby and Turner also critique the often-cited intergenerational-mobility measurement, a method pioneered by a Stanford economist named Raj Chetty and popularized in The New York Times. That gauge measures how well institutions’ low-income students climb income quintiles later in life.

A Warping Metric

But how institutions do on that metric, according to Hoxby and Turner, is warped by the fact that colleges aren’t picking from the same applicant pool. In other words, colleges that serve populations with a larger percentage of low-income students end up enrolling low-income students, and are rewarded on the metric. Meanwhile, colleges located in affluent areas are penalized.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The universities would be rewarded based on their circumstances, not their behavior or effort,” they wrote.

Geography influences outcomes too, the researchers say. In California, which has a wide range of incomes, a college may have an easier job of proving that its alumni increase their earnings later in life. That’s more difficult, Hoxby and Turner say, in a state like Wisconsin, which doesn’t have a high population of extremely low or extremely high earners. And if that’s the case, it’s harder to prove economic mobility.

Hoxby said the intention of Chetty and his fellow researchers was good, but “they’re sort of getting it exactly wrong.”

Opportunity Insights, the nonprofit organization that developed the intergenerational-mobility measure, and that Chetty leads, did not answer a request for comment on Friday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The researchers propose what they call a more-nuanced method of quantifying economic mobility.

It chops a state’s potential applicants into five-percentile segments — rather than quintiles — and measures that against the income profiles of a college’s in-state students. The more closely the two pictures resemble each other, the better the college represents the state’s population. Using that method, colleges would get a better idea of the student populations they’re not enrolling.

The chase to enroll more low-income students can have unintended consequences, they said. Students who are just above the bottom 20th percentile might receive less support from a college that’s seeking solely to increase students from the bottom quintile. Those just above eligibility for a Pell Grant could find themselves arbitrarily cut out of the equation.

Hoxby and Turner stressed that their research is not meant to be prescriptive. They have no desire, they said, to gauge which colleges are doing well or badly. Rather, they said, they want institutions to set their own goals. The hope is to provide a new measuring stick that will allow colleges and their constituents to hold the institutions accountable.

Chris Quintana is a staff reporter. Follow him on Twitter @cquintanadc or email him at chris.quintana@chronicle.com.

A version of this article appeared in the February 8, 2019, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Admissions & Enrollment Innovation & Transformation
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Chris Quintana
About the Author
Chris Quintana
Chris Quintana was a breaking-news reporter for The Chronicle. He graduated from the University of New Mexico with a bachelor’s degree in creative writing.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

The $6 Solution
A Wider Lens on the ‘Match’ Between Students and Colleges
A Low-Cost Way to Expand the Horizons of High-Achieving, Low-Income Students

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin