Can study abroad repair rifts between the U.S. and China?
Chinese President Xi Jinping has called for welcoming 50,000 young Americans to study in his country over the next five years.
Xi made the announcement in November during a speech at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation meetings in San Francisco. The students could travel to China as part of study-abroad or exchange programming, he said.
“The future of China-U.S. relations will be created by our peoples,” Xi said. “The more difficulties there are, the greater the need for us to forge a closer bond between our peoples and to open our hearts to each other, and more people need to speak up for the relationship. We should build more bridges and pave more roads for people-to-people interactions.”
China has lost ground as a destination for American students in recent years because of Covid-related restrictions on foreign travelers as well as geopolitical tensions between the two countries. In the 2021-22 academic year, the most recent data available, just 211 Americans studied in China, according to the Institute of International Education, down from nearly 15,000 in 2011-12.
The U.S. embassy in Beijing has said 350 Americans studied in China last year. (About 290,000 Chinese students studied on American campuses during the same period.)
The numbers are “off the cliff,” said Glenn Shive, a former director of the Hong Kong-America Center.
Xi’s call for more-robust academic exchange echoes efforts a dozen years ago under President Barack Obama to send 100,000 Americans to study in China. The announcement was welcomed by the current American ambassador to China, Nicholas Burns, who called it “encouraging.”
“People-to-people exchange is the ballast to keep the relationship stable,” Burns told the South China Morning Post. But when it comes to restarting academic programming, he also acknowledged that it “may take time to get there.”
Study in China has been slower to bounce back from the pandemic than in other destinations for American students, such as Europe. And even before Covid, the number of Americans going to China was stagnant.
CET Academic Programs, a study-abroad provider, returned to China this summer and had 17 students in Beijing and 16 in Shanghai during the fall semester — a far cry from the 600 who participated in its China offerings in 2019, said Mark Lenhart, the group’s executive director.
Some of the students who might otherwise have studied in mainland China shifted to Taiwan, where CET hosted about 100 students. Taiwan, where CET has worked since 2017, offers a Chinese cultural experience but can be an easier place to study in English. It’s also a destination for students in science and engineering fields, which can be more difficult for foreigners to study in mainland China because of political and security issues.
Such concerns have been dialed up in recent years as the governments of the United States and China have increasingly viewed the other as not just political rivals but as competitors in technology and innovation.
As a result, bilateral academic and research partnerships have come under scrutiny. China has made it more difficult for foreign researchers to access archives and interview average citizens, while under the Trump administration, the United States began the China Initiative to investigate American scientists who work in China.
In July 2020, President Donald J. Trump ended the Fulbright Program to Hong Kong and mainland China after the Chinese government imposed a national-security law in Hong Kong. While the number of Americans who went to China through the flagship U.S. exchange program was small, its cancellation was both a serious and symbolic blow, said Shive, who ran Fulbright exchanges for two decades. “It’s a real self-wounding.”
He said he feared that resuming Fulbright’s exchanges to Hong Kong and China could be difficult given the current domestic political climate in the United States.
Shive and others said having so few Americans studying in China is detrimental at a time when mutual understanding is more important than ever. “I don’t think there’s a substitute for feet on the ground,” said Jeffrey S. Lehman, vice chancellor of New York University’s campus in Shanghai.
NYU-Shanghai, which offers full undergraduate degree programs, was able to continue to enroll both Chinese and international students during the pandemic, even chartering a plane to bring students from the United States to China.
But the falloff in Americans going to China during the pandemic means that today’s students don’t have older classmates to provide advice on studying abroad there. The lack of firsthand information means that students’ understanding of China is often shaped by political messaging or the media. “There’s a real separation of information ecosystems,” said Lehman, who often hears from parents concerned about their children’s safety in China.
The growing distance between the two countries has had other implications. Today’s students may no longer see studying China as a benefit to future careers in business or diplomacy. “Students are practical. If they invest time, they want to know there’s a return on that investment,” said Lenhart, who studied in China in 1987. The Modern Language Association found that enrollments in college Chinese-language courses fell nearly 15 percent between the fall of 2016 and the fall of 2021.
Lenhart said there are other barriers to regaining lost ground. Some colleges and providers that had programs in China before the pandemic have yet to return. The U.S. Department of State put its second-highest travel advisory on China, telling Americans to “reconsider” travel there, and many institutions tie their education-abroad policies to those government warnings. In Florida, a new law makes it difficult for public colleges to run study-abroad or exchange programs in China.
And the aftereffects of Covid have complicated study in China in practical ways. Direct flights between the United States and China are fewer and more expensive. The pervasiveness of cellphone applications in day-to-day life in China can make it difficult for a foreigner to do something as simple as buy a subway ticket.
In a written statement, a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington, D.C., called the resumption of academic and cultural exchanges “the foundation and hope of China-U.S. relations” but said the U.S. government should act to change policies, such as its current travel advisory, that act as “obstacles for the recovery of educational exchanges.”
The statement said the Chinese government sought to have more international students come to China through scholarships, language study, and short-term programs. “The Chinese government has always taken a positive attitude towards welcoming international students, including American students, to China,” the statement said. No new programs have been announced that are specifically tied to Xi’s speech.
Lehman said there have been initial conversations between the Chinese Ministry of Education and educational institutions about ways to expand capacity for study in China. For example, NYU-Shanghai might be able to use its residence halls for summer programs for high-school students during college breaks.
“We have a responsibility to help students understand the diversity and complexity of China,” he said.