Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    Student Housing
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
TheEdgeIcon.png

The Edge

The world is changing. Is higher ed ready to change with it? Senior Writer Scott Carlson helps you better understand higher ed’s accelerating evolution. Delivered every Thursday. To read this newsletter as soon as it sends, sign up to receive it in your email inbox.

July 13, 2022
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email

From: Goldie Blumenstyk

Subject: The Edge: When an Idea to Expand Access Backfires

I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed. This week I report on an experiment meant to help low-income students that ended up doing the opposite, and I share some findings on students’ and professors’ differing preferences for course formats and who’s likely to benefit from public-service loan forgiveness.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

I’m Goldie Blumenstyk, a senior writer at The Chronicle covering innovation in and around higher ed. This week I report on an experiment meant to help low-income students that ended up doing the opposite, and I share some findings on students’ and professors’ differing preferences for course formats and who’s likely to benefit from public-service loan forgiveness.

Know others who might also enjoy The Edge? Please share this link with them so they can get it free in their inbox every week, too.

Lessons from a dual-enrollment experiment that backfired.

A new study caught my attention the other day: an evaluation of a federal experiment to use Pell Grants to encourage more low-income students toward dual-enrollment programs. Spoiler: It didn’t work. That’s significant in its own right, as more policy makers look to dual enrollment as a vehicle for college affordability. And some lessons apply to other innovations, too, however well meaning they may be.

First, some context. Dual enrollment is an increasingly popular model that offers college-level courses to high-school students, promising to increase their college-going rates and save them money on their way to a degree. All but two states now have dual-enrollment policies, as detailed in this handy new guide from the Education Commission of the States. But students from wealthier families are generally more likely to take advantage of the programs. So, in 2016, the federal government began an experiment at 44 colleges in 23 states, letting low-income students use Pell Grants for dual enrollment.

In fact, the Pell Sites program not only failed to increase low-income students’ participation in dual enrollment, it may actually have decreased access. So much for good intentions.

It seems that putting Pell Grants in the mix made for a more-complicated process that ended up deterring low-income students, researchers found. In some cases, students were put off by having to fill out the (notoriously onerous) federal financial-aid form when previously they could have enrolled with state or school-district grants requiring far less paperwork. Students also feared limiting their access to Pell Grants later. Actually, using the Pell money for dual enrollment wouldn’t have had much impact on students’ overall eligibility, but as the Stanford University education economist Eric Bettinger told me this week, that wasn’t well communicated.

“It created more confusion and ambiguity for the students,” said Bettinger, a professor in the Graduate School of Education who conducted the research with a colleague and two graduate students. They examined enrollment trends at four institutions in four states over three years. Nationally, dual enrollment went up, Bettinger said, but not at those institutions.

One takeaway: The Pell Grant isn’t the answer to every problem — even every affordability problem. As Bettinger noted, it’s a program with a lot of “clunky” baggage, not only a complex application process (“the rectal exam that’s FAFSA,” as I recently saw it described on Twitter), but also arcane rules for students to remain eligible.

Those challenges are especially worth noting as Congress considers expanding Pell Grant eligibility to students enrolled in shorter-term education programs. Will that alone increase access and completion? Maybe not. What additional supports or counseling might help? (Hmm, “navigators” perhaps?) Let me know if you have other thoughts.

A related point that caught my attention: “Places with the greatest need tend to be those with the least room to scaffold policy implementation,” the researchers wrote in a blog post about the study. “These institutions and the students they serve may not be able to benefit from even the most well-intentioned policies.” That’s essential to remember not only for expanding Pell Grants, but also for lots of other ideas (or, say, ed-tech tools) that seem promising. Yes, sometimes innovations need to push the envelope, but imposing a new regimen without some confidence that it can be carried out does nobody any favors.

The Pell Sites program expired a couple of weeks ago. The study I described isn’t the only publication to note that the experiment didn’t quite work out. And the U.S. Department of Education was aware “that something structurally was amiss” with the program, Bettinger told me. When he and his team of researchers shared their results with department officials, he said, “they weren’t overly surprised.” The department has promised to produce an evaluation with recommendations for next steps, if any.

Meanwhile, the interviews with students that Bettinger’s team conducted as part of the study found that dual enrollment — “if done right,” he said — does have the potential to increase college-going and lower students’ costs. The key is to couple it with good academic and financial advising, he said, so students aren’t left with “dead credits” that don’t count toward their degrees.

Check these out.

Here are some education-related items from other outlets that recently caught my eye. Did I miss a good one? Let me know.

  • The College Board’s decision to no longer publish AP test results broken down by students’ racial and ethnic groups has alarmed some researchers. The change is significant, Higher Ed Dive reports, because the organization “has come under fire for peddling products like the AP and SAT tests that critics perceive as disadvantaging marginalized groups in higher education.”
  • Lots of punditry about federal public-service loan forgiveness centers on whether the programs amount to giveaways to certain borrowers earning good salaries. But a new study shows that some of the biggest beneficiaries could be teachers and nurses. The National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, by Diego Briones, Nathaniel Ruby, and Sarah Turner, also estimates that some 3.5 million borrowers owing $145 billion in student loans could now be eligible for forgiveness.
  • Since the pandemic, more students (49 percent) than professors (35 percent) are expressing interest in hybrid courses, according to a new survey by Barnes & Noble College. At the same time, more professors (54 percent) than students (33 percent) show interest in fully in-person classes. The findings are part of a larger “College 2030” survey of approximately 2,600 respondents, and the report signals the “challenge for institutions to align the two groups’ differing preferences.”

Got a tip you’d like to share or a question you’d like me to answer? Let me know, at goldie@chronicle.com. If you have been forwarded this newsletter and would like to see past issues, find them here. To receive your own copy, free, register here. If you want to follow me on Twitter, @GoldieStandard is my handle.

Goldie’s Weekly Picks

Photograph of Dr. Larry Arnn, President, Hillsdale College, paired with quotes ""The teachers are trained in the dumbest parts of the dumbest colleges in the country." And
"Now, because they are appointing all these diversity officers, what are their degrees in? Education. It’s easy. You don’t need to know anything."
In the States
‘Uninformed, Misguided, Irresponsible’: Hillsdale President’s Remarks Roil Tennessee Educators
By Brianna Hatch
The president of the Michigan college, which has teamed up with Tennessee, said teachers “are trained in the dumbest parts of the dumbest colleges in the country.”
Photo illustration of four foam hands signifying their brand is #1
The Review | Opinion
Hypercompetition Is Harming Higher Ed
By Julie A. Reuben
Colleges should ease off the branding and remember their shared values.
illustration of blue professor in classroom surrounded by blue Twitter birds
The Review | Opinion
Is Twitter Making Academe Stupid and Mean?
Does Twitter destroy thinking or nurture community? Three professors weigh in.
Tags
Innovation & Transformation Career Preparation Leadership & Governance Finance & Operations Law & Policy
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Protesters gather outside the Department of Education headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2025 to protest the Trump administrations cuts at the agency.
An Uncertain Future
The Education Dept. Got a Green Light to Shrink. Here Are 3 Questions About What’s Next.
Susie West and Dianne Davis-Keening, U of M Extension SuperShelf coordinators.
A 'Connector' Severed
Congress Cut a Federal Nutrition Program, Jeopardizing Campus Jobs and Community Services
PPP 10 FINAL promo.jpg
Bouncing Back?
For Once, Public Confidence in Higher Ed Has Increased
University of California, Berkeley chancellor Dr. Rich Lyons, testifies at a Congressional hearing on antisemitism, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on July 15, 2025. It is the latest in a series of House hearings on antisemitism at the university level, one that critics claim is a convenient way for Republicans to punish universities they consider too liberal or progressive, thereby undermining responses to hate speech and hate crimes. (Photo by Allison Bailey/NurPhoto via AP)
Another Congressional Hearing
3 College Presidents Went to Congress. Here’s What They Talked About.

From The Review

Photo-based illustration with repeated images of a student walking, in the pattern of a graph trending down, then up.
The Review | Opinion
7 Ways Community Colleges Can Boost Enrollment
By Bob Levey
Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin