Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Virtual Events
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    An AI-Driven Work Force
    AI and Microcredentials
Sign In
Government

Colleges Would Have ‘Skin in the Game’ Under Democrats’ Student-Debt Plan

By Andy Thomason December 20, 2013
Washington

Taking aim at mounting levels of student-loan debt, three prominent Democratic senators introduced legislation on Thursday that would penalize colleges and universities whose student-loan default rates exceeded certain thresholds.

By requiring that institutions have “skin in the game"—by assuming some of the risk of default in their students’ federal loans—the proposed legislation would create incentives for colleges to help their students find the least-expensive sources of financial aid, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island said during a press call. Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois and Sen. Elizabeth A. Warren of Massachusetts, who also participated in the call, co-sponsored the bill.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Taking aim at mounting levels of student-loan debt, three prominent Democratic senators introduced legislation on Thursday that would penalize colleges and universities whose student-loan default rates exceeded certain thresholds.

By requiring that institutions have “skin in the game"—by assuming some of the risk of default in their students’ federal loans—the proposed legislation would create incentives for colleges to help their students find the least-expensive sources of financial aid, Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island said during a press call. Sen. Richard J. Durbin of Illinois and Sen. Elizabeth A. Warren of Massachusetts, who also participated in the call, co-sponsored the bill.

The proposed legislation, dubbed the Protect Student Borrowers Act of 2013, would affect only institutions that have federal student-aid enrollment rates of 25 percent or higher, and the penalties would be imposed on a sliding scale.

Colleges and universities with student-loan default rates of more than 30 percent would pay a fine to the Department of Education equal to 20 percent of the total value of loans issued to their students in default. As default rates decline, so would the proposed fines; the least-severe infraction—default rates from 15 percent to 20 percent—would require a 5-percent penalty.

According to the text of the bill, the fines would be funneled into a fund that the department would use for projects that deal with student-loan “delinquency and default prevention or rehabilitation.” Some of the revenue would also be used to “offset any future shortfalls” in funds for the federal Pell Grant. In addition, the secretary of education would have the authority to waive the penalties in certain cases.

‘Pretty Much Indifferent’

The proposed borrower-protection act is the latest in a slew of recent federal initiatives aimed at combating student-loan debt. The Education Department has long had the authority to cut off federal funds for institutions whose default rates exceed a certain threshold. The department’s controversial “gainful employment” rule, in its current proposed form, would deny funds to career-oriented programs with default rates that are too high or that fail other tests. The much-discussed college-ratings system at the center of President Obama’s higher-education plan would also probably include graduates’ debt as a metric.

Mr. Reed said the proposed bill would more effectively drive down levels of student debt, as the Education Department now punishes only “the most extravagant, outrageous schools.” He added that the prospect of penalties would get institutions “thinking seriously about their default rates and their practices and the programs they offer.”

Ms. Warren added that, currently, institutions are “pretty much indifferent” to the plight of students who are overborrowing or struggling to repay their loans. But, she said, “if a school says, ‘Wait a minute, I’ll lose money and have to rebate it back to the federal government,’ the school has a much more intense interest in making sure students have an opportunity to graduate in four years.”

The proposed legislation would hit for-profit institutions the hardest, as their graduates have the highest default rates, on average. In a statement released on Thursday, the Association of Private Sector Colleges and Universities challenged the effectiveness of the bill.

“Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act is the right way to address these issues, not a piecemeal approach to student outcomes and debt that only applies certain regulations to some institutions and, when combined, may leave low-income students on the outside looking in,” the statement said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Law & Policy Political Influence & Activism
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
Thomason_Andy.jpg
About the Author
Andy Thomason
Andy Thomason is an assistant managing editor at The Chronicle and the author of the book Discredited: The UNC Scandal and College Athletics’ Amateur Ideal.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Photo illustration showing Santa Ono seated, places small in the corner of a dark space
'Unrelentingly Sad'
Santa Ono Wanted a Presidency. He Became a Pariah.
Illustration of a rushing crowd carrying HSI letters
Seeking precedent
Funding for Hispanic-Serving Institutions Is Discriminatory and Unconstitutional, Lawsuit Argues
Photo-based illustration of scissors cutting through paper that is a photo of an idyllic liberal arts college campus on one side and money on the other
Finance
Small Colleges Are Banding Together Against a Higher Endowment Tax. This Is Why.
Pano Kanelos, founding president of the U. of Austin.
Q&A
One Year In, What Has ‘the Anti-Harvard’ University Accomplished?

From The Review

Photo- and type-based illustration depicting the acronym AAUP with the second A as the arrow of a compass and facing not north but southeast.
The Review | Essay
The Unraveling of the AAUP
By Matthew W. Finkin
Photo-based illustration of the Capitol building dome propped on a stick attached to a string, like a trap.
The Review | Opinion
Colleges Can’t Trust the Federal Government. What Now?
By Brian Rosenberg
Illustration of an unequal sign in black on a white background
The Review | Essay
What Is Replacing DEI? Racism.
By Richard Amesbury

Upcoming Events

Plain_Acuity_DurableSkills_VF.png
Why Employers Value ‘Durable’ Skills
Warwick_Leadership_Javi.png
University Transformation: a Global Leadership Perspective
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin