> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Review of University Rankings Offers a Comprehensive Critique of the Process

By  Aisha Labi
June 17, 2011

International university rankings have “galvanized” the world of higher education, but, despite their growing influence, they provide only an “oversimplified picture” of the mission of universities, says a new report released today. What’s more, the report says, any benefits the rankings might provide are outweighed by an overall lack of openness about how they are conducted and the “negative effects” of their impact.

The report, “Global University Rankings and Their Impact,” was commissioned by the Brussels-based European University Association, whose members include 850 universities and rectors organizations in 47 countries, and represents the organization’s first major foray into the sometimes contentious discussion of international rankings.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

International university rankings have “galvanized” the world of higher education, but, despite their growing influence, they provide only an “oversimplified picture” of the mission of universities, says a new report released today. What’s more, the report says, any benefits the rankings might provide are outweighed by an overall lack of openness about how they are conducted and the “negative effects” of their impact.

The report, “Global University Rankings and Their Impact,” was commissioned by the Brussels-based European University Association, whose members include 850 universities and rectors organizations in 47 countries, and represents the organization’s first major foray into the sometimes contentious discussion of international rankings.

Lesley Wilson, the university association’s secretary general, explained that the organization decided to conduct an analysis of the different international rankings in response to demand from universities. “We receive an enormous number of questions from our members, asking what the difference is between the rankings, saying they are not sure of the different methodologies,” she said.

The report provides a comprehensive analysis of the various methodologies used by the international rankings, including both the better-known compilations such as those produced annually by China’s Shanghai Jiao Tong University and Times Higher Education, as well as more recent entrants to the field, such as the new U-Multirank project that is being backed by the European Union.

The report says that “global university rankings reflect university research performance far more accurately than teaching” and emphasizes that many of the indicators on which rankings are based are susceptible to manipulation by institutions seeking to boost their performance in the lists. At the same time, rankings are here to stay, and the proliferation of international rankings does offer some benefits, including fostering accountability and encouraging the collection of more-reliable data, the report notes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms. Wilson said that the report is intended to be the first in a series. “We’re quite interested in feedback from our members. Depending on the issues they bring up, we will continue to report on international rankings, and we will try to take up broader questions of the impact of rankings,” she said.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
International
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin