Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
Commentary

Shared Governance Does Not Mean Shared Decision Making

By Scott S. Cowen August 13, 2018
Hurricane Katrina, in September 2005, shut down the Tulane campus for five months.
Hurricane Katrina, in September 2005, shut down the Tulane campus for five months.David J. Phillip, AP Images

Over the course of my career, I’ve observed two speeds of governance: foot-on-the-brake for everyday business and pedal-to-the-metal for existential decisions. I’ve also grappled with how to honor the process of shared governance without slowing decision-making to a crawl, especially in situations that require immediate action. A first step is to make sure that everyone understands that the sharing in “shared governance” isn’t equally distributed, nor does it imply decision-making authority. That authority is held by the president and the board, the ones who are accountable for both results and shortcomings.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

Hurricane Katrina, in September 2005, shut down the Tulane campus for five months.
Hurricane Katrina, in September 2005, shut down the Tulane campus for five months.David J. Phillip, AP Images

Over the course of my career, I’ve observed two speeds of governance: foot-on-the-brake for everyday business and pedal-to-the-metal for existential decisions. I’ve also grappled with how to honor the process of shared governance without slowing decision-making to a crawl, especially in situations that require immediate action. A first step is to make sure that everyone understands that the sharing in “shared governance” isn’t equally distributed, nor does it imply decision-making authority. That authority is held by the president and the board, the ones who are accountable for both results and shortcomings.

I used to say that when Hurricane Katrina nearly destroyed Tulane University, in the fall of 2005, it was the temporary suspension of shared governance that allowed us to recover. Our renewal plan, which involved tremendous institutional restructuring in a short time, precluded the lengthy deliberations prescribed by normal governance procedures. But with the benefit of hindsight and another decade of experience in university leadership, I’ve come to realize that what occurred after Katrina was not, in fact, the suspension of shared governance, but rather the emergence of a more effective and unencumbered version of shared governance.

Specifically, the Faculty Advisory Committee, a subgroup of elected representatives that assumes the University Senate’s powers and responsibilities when the Senate cannot function, was key to what happened in the five crucial months when Tulane was closed after the hurricane — when schools were consolidated, several programs eliminated, and a number of staff and faculty positions terminated. The committee members’ commitment to partnering with the administration and the governing board, their constructive critiques of the proposals, and their role as representatives of the full Senate were essential to the renewal plan itself, as well as to its acceptance by the Tulane community.

A transformation as swift and sweeping as the one we underwent generally seems unthinkable in higher education. What made it possible was not only a crisis that forced us to reimagine what Tulane could be, but also a leaner, expedited shared governance that was able to rapidly enact the decisive changes. That is, shared governance is not an impediment to action — an idea I may have unwittingly communicated in my description of our exceptional governance situation after Katrina — but a competitive advantage, one that differentiates institutions of higher education from many other organizations in both the for-profit and nonprofit sectors.

What does this mean for shared governance at colleges in “normal” times? Crises are energizing — there’s nothing like a hurricane to bring everyone together — but the current climate of uncertainty and upheaval in higher education, with public approval declining, financial stresses increasing, and social issues playing out on campuses, poses its own set of existential challenges. How can colleges generate the sense of purpose, urgency, and unity that follows on the heels of a Katrina, even without Katrina?

The best model, I believe, is a university senate — composed of elected representatives and chaired by a president genuinely open to rational persuasion and debate — that brings together diverse constituents, including faculty, staff, and students, encourages spirited dialogue, and provides a direct line to the institution’s leadership, including its governing board. I would also recommend the creation of an executive committee of the senate, which under ordinary circumstances would periodically interact with trustees to confer on substantive issues regarding the college’s future, but which would also have the authority to act quickly should the need arise.

Defining and communicating “the need” is a crucial element. Though some people may not perceive the gravity of a developing reputational or fiscal crisis, such threats warrant an all-hands-on-deck mentality, and it’s the president’s responsibility to evoke a sense of urgency by making the crisis real for everyone. A crisis narrative, when based on facts and conveyed effectively by a leader, can generate the sense of coherent purpose that pulls the community together and spurs people to action with or without a bona fide crisis.

While not without its critics, Arizona State University is one of those institutions that have undergone a major transformation, in the face of financial pressures, based on the perceived need to change and a strong vision of the future. Under the leadership of Michael Crow and with increasing buy-in from faculty members and administrators over the years, ASU has consolidated academic departments into large units, formed public-private partnerships, and expanded online offerings in an effort to embody the “New American University.”

Another way to create a sense of communal purpose and a basis for action is through initiatives that encourage reflection about roles and responsibilities. For example, Gustavus Adolphus College hosted a series of open meetings with the theme of “working together on working together.” Another example is Fort Lewis College, where a yearlong process of revising its mission statement involved everyone from administrators to students. Even in a noncrisis situation, a continuing conversation about mission and meaning can elicit enthusiasm, commitment, and esprit d’corps.

A crisis narrative, when based on facts and conveyed effectively by a leader, can generate the sense of coherent purpose that pulls the community together.

To help colleges survive and thrive in a rapidly evolving environment, we must create space for change through effective decision-making. A new model of shared governance that is inclusive but also nimble and flexible will be necessary.

ADVERTISEMENT

Faculty and staff members and students will need to understand and accept their roles as advisers, as opposed to decision makers; an executive committee will need to be prepared to step up when the going gets tough and time is of the essence; trustees will need to do justice to the great responsibility they’ve been entrusted with; and the president, who is both leader and follower, will need to hold the conductor’s baton and help everyone keep the tempo. That kind of equilibrium will put us at a competitive advantage during these uncertain times.

Scott S. Cowen is president emeritus at Tulane University and the author, most recently, of Winnebagos on Wednesday: How Visionary Leadership Can Transform Higher Education (Princeton University Press, 2018).

A version of this article appeared in the September 14, 2018, issue.
We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Related Content

2005: A City and Its Colleges, Devastated
You Don’t Need a Hurricane to Know Which Way the Wind Blows
In the Calm After the Storm, Tulane’s President Plans to Retire

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
Duke Administrators Accused of Bypassing Shared-Governance Process in Offering Buyouts
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson
Vector illustration of a suited man with a pair of scissors for a tie and an American flag button on his lapel.
The Review | Opinion
A Damaging Endowment Tax Crosses the Finish Line
By Phillip Levine
University of Virginia President Jim Ryan keeps his emotions in check during a news conference, Monday, Nov. 14, 2022 in Charlottesville. Va. Authorities say three people have been killed and two others were wounded in a shooting at the University of Virginia and a student is in custody. (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
The Review | Opinion
Jim Ryan’s Resignation Is a Warning
By Robert Zaretsky

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin