> Skip to content
FEATURED:
  • The Evolution of Race in Admissions
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
  • News
  • Advice
  • The Review
  • Data
  • Current Issue
  • Virtual Events
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Career Resources
Sign In
ADVERTISEMENT
News
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Show more sharing options
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
  • Copy Link URLCopied!
  • Print

Sociologists Caution Colleges Not to Over-Rely on Student Evaluations of Teaching

By  Beckie Supiano
September 9, 2019
Student UC Merced evaluation
Max Whittaker for The Chronicle

The American Sociological Association released on Monday a statement laying out the problems with student evaluations of teaching and urging colleges not to over-rely on them.

“Student feedback,” says the statement, which was endorsed by 17 other scholarly associations, “should not be used alone as a measure of teaching quality. If it is used in faculty evaluation processes, it should be considered as part of a holistic assessment of teaching effectiveness.”

An extensive research literature has identified problems with student evaluations of teaching. In its statement, the association cites two key issues. For one, course evaluations don’t measure the quality of teaching particularly well. They are “weakly related to other measures,” like students’ performance on exams, the statement says, and are often used in “statistically problematic ways,” for instance assigning too much importance to small differences.

We’re sorry. Something went wrong.

We are unable to fully display the content of this page.

The most likely cause of this is a content blocker on your computer or network. Please make sure your computer, VPN, or network allows javascript and allows content to be delivered from c950.chronicle.com and chronicle.blueconic.net.

Once javascript and access to those URLs are allowed, please refresh this page. You may then be asked to log in, create an account if you don't already have one, or subscribe.

If you continue to experience issues, contact us at 202-466-1032 or help@chronicle.com

Student UC Merced evaluation
Max Whittaker for The Chronicle

The American Sociological Association released on Monday a statement laying out the problems with student evaluations of teaching and urging colleges not to over-rely on them.

“Student feedback,” says the statement, which was endorsed by 17 other scholarly associations, “should not be used alone as a measure of teaching quality. If it is used in faculty evaluation processes, it should be considered as part of a holistic assessment of teaching effectiveness.”

An extensive research literature has identified problems with student evaluations of teaching. In its statement, the association cites two key issues. For one, course evaluations don’t measure the quality of teaching particularly well. They are “weakly related to other measures,” like students’ performance on exams, the statement says, and are often used in “statistically problematic ways,” for instance assigning too much importance to small differences.

The other problem: The evaluations are biased, and “systematically disadvantage faculty from marginalized groups,” including women and minorities.

ADVERTISEMENT

That all matters because the evaluations typically factor into colleges’ personnel decisions, such as tenure determinations, promotions, and raises. For contingent faculty members, strong evaluations can be a condition for continued employment.

In the statement, which the American Historical Association, the American Political Science Association, and the National Communication Association endorsed, the American Sociological Association provides a set of best practices for colleges. Among them: Ask students to give feedback about their own experiences, not assign ratings, and use evaluations to locate patterns in a professor’s teaching over time, not to compare that professor to others.

The statement also provides examples of colleges that have taken a holistic approach to assessing teaching. The University of Oregon, for instance, has created a framework that includes peer review, self-reflection, and student feedback.

This is not the first time a major scholarly association has weighed in on the question of how teaching should be evaluated. In 2013 the American Educational Research Association released a report, “Rethinking Faculty Evaluation,” that said teaching assessment should be based on what students learn. That, it said, cannot be derived from student ratings. Instead, the report said, colleges should draw on evidence from teaching portfolios, classroom observations, and surveys and interviews of both students and professors.

Further Reading From The Chronicle

The problems with course evaluations:

ADVERTISEMENT

Research has found that students judge professors who are women more harshly than those who are men.

If course evaluations are steeped in bias, and they’re used in personnel decisions, then colleges could face litigation.

The value of student feedback:

Students can be trained to give better feedback, as in this effort at the University of California at Merced.

Kevin Gannon offers some advice for interpreting course evaluations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Models for evaluating teaching:

Adopt a better student evaluation, says the IDEA Center.

Use an inventory of teaching practices, argues Carl Wieman, an advocate for science teaching.

Incorporate peer evaluations, suggests Philip B. Stark. That’s the direction in which the University of Southern California has recently moved.

Beckie Supiano writes about teaching, learning, and the human interactions that shape them. Follow her on Twitter @becksup, or drop her a line at beckie.supiano@chronicle.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Teaching & LearningInnovation & Transformation
Beckie Supiano
Beckie Supiano writes about teaching, learning, and the human interactions that shape them. Follow her on Twitter @becksup, or drop her a line at beckie.supiano@chronicle.com.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
    Explore
    • Get Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Blogs
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Find a Job
  • The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
    The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • DEI Commitment Statement
    • Write for Us
    • Talk to Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • User Agreement
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Site Map
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
    Customer Assistance
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise With Us
    • Post a Job
    • Advertising Terms and Conditions
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
    Subscribe
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Manage Your Account
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2023 The Chronicle of Higher Education
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin