Skip to content
ADVERTISEMENT
Sign In
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
  • More
  • Sections
    • News
    • Advice
    • The Review
  • Topics
    • Data
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
    • Finance & Operations
    • International
    • Leadership & Governance
    • Teaching & Learning
    • Scholarship & Research
    • Student Success
    • Technology
    • Transitions
    • The Workplace
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Special Issues
    • Podcast: College Matters from The Chronicle
  • Newsletters
  • Events
    • Virtual Events
    • Chronicle On-The-Road
    • Professional Development
  • Ask Chron
  • Store
    • Featured Products
    • Reports
    • Data
    • Collections
    • Back Issues
  • Jobs
    • Find a Job
    • Post a Job
    • Professional Development
    • Career Resources
    • Virtual Career Fair
    Upcoming Events:
    College Advising
    Serving Higher Ed
    Chronicle Festival 2025
Sign In
The Chronicle Review

The Toxic History of Philosophy’s Racism

By Carlin Romano September 8, 2014
Hegel believed that the African mind-set invited slavery.
Hegel believed that the African mind-set invited slavery. Universal History Archive, UIG via Getty Images

That much-ballyhooed crisis in the humanities? Maybe it’s not what humanities professors usually whine about—the decline of institutional support for their disciplines, the shunning of their majors by students from Generation Smartphone.

Maybe the real crisis lies in ossified canons and syllabi that ignore globalization and the engagement with everyday life expected by today’s undergraduate. Force her to read Chaucer, or sentence her to gobs of Hobbes and his archaic diction, and you’ve got a pretty good recipe for self-inflicted extinction.

To continue reading for FREE, please sign in.

Sign In

Or subscribe now to read with unlimited access for as low as $10/month.

Don’t have an account? Sign up now.

A free account provides you access to a limited number of free articles each month, plus newsletters, job postings, salary data, and exclusive store discounts.

Sign Up

That much-ballyhooed crisis in the humanities? Maybe it’s not what humanities professors usually whine about—the decline of institutional support for their disciplines, the shunning of their majors by students from Generation Smartphone.

Maybe the real crisis lies in ossified canons and syllabi that ignore globalization and the engagement with everyday life expected by today’s undergraduate. Force her to read Chaucer, or sentence her to gobs of Hobbes and his archaic diction, and you’ve got a pretty good recipe for self-inflicted extinction.

A particular weakness of many humanities canons remains their scant or nonexistent attention to material outside of Europe and North America, their historical dismissal of South Asian, East Asian, and African achievement due to ignorance and condescending Orientalism. Although philosophy is probably the worst among humanities disciplines in this respect, it’s hardly alone.

History and literature departments have done the best job of updating their canons and recognizing classic works outside of Europe and North America, but as pointed out by the University of Leuven scholar Theo D’haen, editor in chief of the European Review, the story of scholarship in history and world literature reveals some absurd yet influential attitudes.

Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780-1830

By Peter K.J. Park State University of New York Press)

In The History of British India (1817-36), D’haen notes, James Mill observed that India possessed only legends, and was “perfectly destitute of historical records.” Around the same time, no less than Thomas Macaulay opined that “a single shelf of a good European library [is] worth the whole native literature of India and Arabia.”

Similarly, D’haen has written, the first book in English about world literature as an academic subject, Richard Green Moulton’s World Literature and Its Place in General Culture (1911), included some Middle Eastern texts, but completely excluded Chinese and Japanese literature. By 1940, the Stanford literary scholar Albert Guérard, in his Preface to World Literature, acknowledged that the East was “woefully underrepresented” in the canon. Fortunately, in recent years, such standard texts as The Norton Anthology of World Literature and The Longman Anthology of World Literature have redressed the imbalance.

Now, finally, we have an excellent account of a parallel ugly history: the exclusion of Asian and African texts from the canon of world philosophy. In Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780-1830, Peter K.J. Park, an associate professor of historical studies at the University of Texas at Dallas, expertly recounts the radical change, in 18th- and early-19th-century Germany, that took place in understanding philosophy and its history. It was a shift that powerfully affected the future of both.

Park shows how Christoph Meiners (1747-1810), a philosophy professor at the University of Göttingen and prolific scholar, initiated “a successful campaign to exclude Africa and Asia from the history of philosophy.” In turn, Wilhelm Tennemann (1761-1819), the most important Kantian historian at the turn of the 19th century, and Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (who observed that “real philosophy begins in Greece”) carried the campaign forward. They channeled elements of Meiners in almost identical language, leading to “the formation within German philosophy of an exclusionary, Eurocentric canon of philosophy.”

“Stated more simply,” Park contends, “historians of philosophy began to exclude peoples they deemed too primitive and incapable of philosophy,” noting Hegel’s belief that the African mind-set invited slavery. While it may surprise contemporary philosophers and graduate students brought up on the standard canon, Park correctly reports that from “the time of Marsilio Ficino (1433-99) to the death of Étienne Bonnot de Condillac (1715-80), the prevailing convention among historians of philosophy was to begin the history of philosophy with Adam, Noah, Moses (or the Jews), or the Egyptians. In some early modern histories of philosophy, Zoroaster, the ‘Chaldeans,’ or another ancient Oriental people appear as the first philosophers. It was in the late 18th century that historians of philosophy began to claim a Greek beginning for philosophy.”

The upshot of this German pivot became obvious as the 19th century rolled on. In 1865, Friedrich Michelis wrote in his history of philosophy, “No Asian people … has lifted itself to the heights of free human contemplation, from which philosophy issues; philosophy is the fruit of the Hellenic spirit.” Although Park describes a countertradition, energized by Friedrich Schlegel (1772-1829) and the Frenchman Joseph-Marie de Gérando (1772-1842), that continued to include Asian thought (Schlegel wrote that “the Indians had real philosophy in both form and method”), Park provides many similar examples from 19th-century German history of philosophy of tub-thumping for the Greeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

That approach won the day—and the future. As Park indicates through resourcefully adduced evidence from 19th-century texts, “some of these histories present no reasons for the exclusion of Asia and Africa, taking a Greek origin of philosophy for granted.” Others promoted a strictly Kantian agenda that required history of philosophy to be an a priori “autonomous field of knowledge” explorable apart from empirical data.

Park’s study is not the first to establish the racism of towering figures in the traditional philosophical canon. Many have noted such embarrassments as Hume’s footnote to his essay “Of National Characters” stating that nonwhites are inferior to whites. The Penn State philosopher Robert Bernasconi, to whom Park gives well-deserved credit, has explored Kant’s racism, as well as Hegel’s and Heidegger’s denial that Indian or Chinese philosophy counted as philosophy. Wilhelm Halbfass and Richard King are other scholars who have probed such subjects. But Park now gives us a book-length account of this ugly backdrop to arbitrariness and distortion in the discipline’s canon—an acute, critical narrative that should force philosophers to re-examine disreputable pillars of their tradition.

Park’s work also provides a perfect bookend to an earlier groundbreaking study of how German scholars rearranged philosophy’s canon toward the end of the 18th century: The Historiographical Concept ‘System of Philosophy’: Its Origin, Nature, Influence and Legitimacy (Brill, 2008), by the Danish scholar Leo Catana.

In that sedulous, comprehensive work, Catana demonstrated in exact detail how Jacob Brucker (1696-1770), the foremost German historian of philosophy of the late 18th century owing to his multivolume Historia critica philosophiae, decided that only “systematic” philosophy counted as philosophy. He urged that ideas be put forward apart from any connection to their authors’ or proponents’ lives, and suggested that including biographical details—the norm in history of philosophy since Diogenes Laertius invented the genre in the third century with his Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers—amounted to vulgarization.

ADVERTISEMENT

A humanities discipline, to borrow Richard Posner’s pointed image, is not a suicide pact. It should investigate its own past, and change in ways that keep it vibrant, challenging, and relevant. Philosophy, with its smug and static canon, is long overdue for rethinking. As its ancient hero Socrates might have put it: The unexamined canon is not worth teaching.

Carlin Romano, critic at large for The Chronicle, is a distinguished visiting scholar at the Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies at Peking University. His book, America the Philosophical (2012), is now out as a Vintage paperback.

We welcome your thoughts and questions about this article. Please email the editors or submit a letter for publication.
Tags
Opinion
Share
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Email
About the Author
Carlin Romano
Carlin Romano, former critic at large for The Chronicle, is a professor of philosophy and humanities at Ursinus College and author of America the Philosophical (Knopf, 2012).
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

More News

Vector illustration of large open scissors  with several workers in seats dangling by white lines
Iced Out
The Death of Shared Governance
Illustration showing money being funnelled into the top of a microscope.
'A New Era'
Higher-Ed Associations Pitch an Alternative to Trump’s Cap on Research Funding
Illustration showing classical columns of various heights, each turning into a stack of coins
Endowment funds
The Nation’s Wealthiest Small Colleges Just Won a Big Tax Exemption
WASHINGTON, DISTICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES - 2025/04/14: A Pro-Palestinian demonstrator holding a sign with Release Mahmud Khalil written on it, stands in front of the ICE building while joining in a protest. Pro-Palestinian demonstrators rally in front of the ICE building, demanding freedom for Mahmoud Khalil and all those targeted for speaking out against genocide in Palestine. Protesters demand an end to U.S. complicity and solidarity with the resistance in Gaza. (Photo by Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Campus Activism
An Anonymous Group’s List of Purported Critics of Israel Helped Steer a U.S. Crackdown on Student Activists

From The Review

Illustration of an ocean tide shaped like Donald Trump about to wash away sandcastles shaped like a college campus.
The Review | Essay
Why Universities Are So Powerless in Their Fight Against Trump
By Jason Owen-Smith
Photo-based illustration of a closeup of a pencil meshed with a circuit bosrd
The Review | Essay
How Are Students Really Using AI?
By Derek O'Connell
John T. Scopes as he stood before the judges stand and was sentenced, July 2025.
The Review | Essay
100 Years Ago, the Scopes Monkey Trial Discovered Academic Freedom
By John K. Wilson

Upcoming Events

07-31-Turbulent-Workday_assets v2_Plain.png
Keeping Your Institution Moving Forward in Turbulent Times
Ascendium_Housing_Plain.png
What It Really Takes to Serve Students’ Basic Needs: Housing
Lead With Insight
  • Explore Content
    • Latest News
    • Newsletters
    • Letters
    • Free Reports and Guides
    • Professional Development
    • Events
    • Chronicle Store
    • Chronicle Intelligence
    • Jobs in Higher Education
    • Post a Job
  • Know The Chronicle
    • About Us
    • Vision, Mission, Values
    • DEI at The Chronicle
    • Write for Us
    • Work at The Chronicle
    • Our Reporting Process
    • Advertise With Us
    • Brand Studio
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Account and Access
    • Manage Your Account
    • Manage Newsletters
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Group and Institutional Access
    • Subscription & Account FAQ
  • Get Support
    • Contact Us
    • Reprints & Permissions
    • User Agreement
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • California Privacy Policy
    • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
1255 23rd Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20037
© 2025 The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Chronicle of Higher Education is academe’s most trusted resource for independent journalism, career development, and forward-looking intelligence. Our readers lead, teach, learn, and innovate with insights from The Chronicle.
Follow Us
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • youtube
  • facebook
  • linkedin